Lawson’s Psychological Critical Thinking Exam as an instrument to improve critical thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.47238Keywords:
critical thinking, PCTE, Spanish adaptation, LawsonAbstract
INTRODUCTION. Critical thinking is vital in both science and daily life, being crucial for identifying anecdotal evidence, unfalsifiable hypotheses, biased data sampling, and unreliable causal connections. This study aimed to adapt Lawson’s revised version of the Psychological Critical Thinking Exam (PCTE) into Spanish, and to use it to assess improvement in Psychology students taking a module on reasoning.
METHOD. Eighty-seven third-year Psychology students responded to the odd items of the original PCTE at the beginning of the term, and to the even items at the end. During the module, one session was dedicated to discussing Lawson’s critical thinking questions, evaluating the reliability of purportedly scientific statements.
RESULTS. Students’ critical thinking skills improved both in problem detection (i.e., volunteers who initially failed to identify methodological problems, then did) and in accurately detecting the target problem (i.e., issues related to the critical thinking question addressed).
DISCUSSION. We consider the PCTE a valuable tool for assessing and developing critical thinking among university students. Moreover, we suggest that this study itself could serve as didactic material for analysis by students, enhancing their critical thinking skills.
References
American Psychological Association. (2016). Guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. American Psychologist, 71(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/gd7fp9
Bensley, D. A., & Murtagh, M. P. (2012). Guidelines for a scientific approach to critical thinking assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 5–16. https://doi.org/gd7fpk
Dowd, J. E., Thompson, R. J., Schiff, L. A., & Reynolds, J. A. (2018). Understanding the complex relationship between critical thinking and science reasoning among undergraduate thesis writers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/gjtctb
European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office. https://tinyurl.com/yb3tz22y
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking : A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction – The Delphi Report. The California Academic Press, 423(c), 1–19. https://tinyurl.com/5yr9644z
Halpern, D. F., & Dunn, D. S. (2021). Critical thinking: A model of intelligence for solving real-world problems. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 22. https://doi.org/gkj8mh
Holyoak, K., & Morrison, R. G. (2005). Thinking and reasoning: A reader’s guide. In K.J. Holyoak & R.G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp.1–9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/nsqg
Koerber, S., Mayer, D., Osterhaus, C., Schwippert, K., & Sodian, B. (2015). The Development of Scientific Thinking in Elementary School: A Comprehensive Inventory. Child Development, 86(1), 327–336. https://doi.org/ghgfbs
Lawson, T. J. (1999). Assessing psychological critical thinking as a learning outcome for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 26(3), 207–209. https://doi.org/d28n8d
Lawson, T. J., Jordan-Fleming, M. K., & Bodle, J. H. (2015). Measuring psychological critical thinking: An update. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/gd7fp2
Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., & David, M. (2012). Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error. Journal of School Psychology, 50(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/dm76fm
Lilienfeld, S., Lynn, S., Ruscio, J., & Beyerstein, B. (2010). 50 great myths of popular psychology. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
Majima, Y. (2015). Belief in Pseudoscience, Cognitive Style and Science Literacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(4), 552–559. https://doi.org/f7j827
Minott, D., Ferguson, T., & Minott, G. (2019). Critical Thinking and Sustainable Development. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education (pp. 1–6). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/nsqh
OECD. (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers, 1–23. https://tinyurl.com/yxkecrdu
Straková, Z., & Cimermanová, I. (2018). Critical Thinking Development—A Necessary Step in Higher Education Transformation towards Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(10), 3366. https://doi.org/gfm7jc
Taimur, S., & Sattar, H. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development and Critical Thinking Competency. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1–11. https://doi.org/nsqj
Witkowski, T. (2010). Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 41(2). https://doi.org/bqxrxt
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marta-Natalia Torres-Domínguez, Itxaso Barberia, Javier Rodríguez-Ferreiro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors keep authorship rights and confer to REIRE the rights of article’s first publication.
All the contents included into REIRE Revista d’innovació i Recerca en Educació are under Creative Commons 4.0 International license attribution, which allows the article’s reproduction, distribution and public communication, whenever authorship and the journal’s title is quoted.
