DIY culture in the university: from the teacher’s proposal to the student’s experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2019.12.121189Keywords:
Innovation, Creativity, Communicative competence, Cooperation, DIY approachAbstract
This paper addresses one of the current challenges facing university teaching by analyzing the implementation of the DIY approach in the teaching and learning processes in the University of Barcelona’s Bachelor’s Degree in Education. In addition to including teachers’ reflections on the experience, the analysis incorporates the voices of participating students. The text is divided into four sections. First, the INTRODUCTION gives an account of what the DIY approach represents. Second, the METHOD describes the European project that informed this research as well as the other two processes by which a DIY philosophy was implemented at the University of Barcelona. Third, the RESULTS section reviews the findings obtained during the implementation of DIYLab in a specific case. Fourth, the DISCUSSION of the results and some final considerations analyzes the challenges and the possibilities of introducing DIY culture in the University, as well as the contributions these projects make to improving teaching.References
Bauman, Z. (2008). Los restos de la educación en la Modernidad Líquida. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Casanellas, M., y Medir, L. (2013). Capacitat d’aprenentatge i responsabilitat. En R. Sayós (coord.), Competències transversals a les titulacions de grau de la Universitat de Barcelona. Orientacions per al seu desenvolupament (pp. 22–35). Barcelona: Octaedro-ICE.
Cobo, C. (2016). La Innovación Pendiente: Reflexiones (y Provocaciones) sobre educación, tecnología y conocimiento. Nueva York: Penguin Random House.
Cobo, C., y Moravec, J. W. (2011). Aprendizaje invisible. Hacia una nueva ecología de la educación. Barcelona: Publicacions i Edicions, Universitat de Barcelona.
Eisenberg, M., y Buechley, L. (2008). Pervasive Fabrication: Making Construction Ubiquitous in Education. Journal of Software, 3(4), 62–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jsw.3.4.62-68
Erstad, O., y Sefton-Green, J. (eds.). (2013). Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1019-1
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., y Chajut, E. (2009). Changes over time in digital literacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 713–715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0264
European Communities. (2007). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. European Reference Framework. Luxemburgo: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Garrison, D. R., y Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. Londres-Nueva York: Routledge-Falmer. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093
Giddens, A. (2000). Modernidad e Identidad del Yo. El yo y la sociedad en la época contemporánea. Barcelona: Península.
Groff, J. S. (2013). Expanding our “frames” of mind for education and the arts. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 15–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.1.kk34802147665819
Guzzetti, B. J., Elliott, K., y Welsch, D. (2010). DIY Media in the Classroom: New Literacies Across Content Areas. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Halfacree, K. (2004). “It could only do wrong”: Academic Research and DIY Culture. En D. Fuller, y R. Kitchin (eds.), Radical Theory/Critical Praxis: Making a Difference Beyond the Academy? (pp. 68–78). Victoria, Canadá: Praxis Press.
Halverson, E., y Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
Hernández-Hernández, F., y Onsès, J. (2016). La evaluación de los objetos visuales digitales. En F. Hernández-Hernández, y J. M. Sancho-Gil (coords.), La perspectiva DIY en la Universidad: ¡hazlo tú mismo y en colaboración! (pp. 87–94). Barcelona, España: Octaedro.
Hernández-Hernández, F., y Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2017). Using meta-ethnographic analysis to understand and represent youth’s notions and experiences of learning in and out of secondary school. Ethnography and Education, 12(2), 178–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2016.1180542
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., y Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Boston, US: Mit Press.
Kafai, Y., y Peppler, K. (2011). Youth, Technology, and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X10383211
Knobel, M., y Lankshear, C. (eds.). (2010). DIY Media: Creating, Sharing and Learning with New Technologies. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Majó, A., Onsès, J., y Sánchez, J. A. (2017). Lo que hemos aprendido en torno a la filosofía DIY. En F. Hernández-Hernández, y J. M. Sancho-Gil (coords.), La perspectiva DIY en la Universidad: ¡hazlo tú mismo y en colaboración! (pp. 25–38). Barcelona, España: Octaedro.
McKay, G. (ed.). (1998). DIY culture: Party & protest in nineties. England: Verso.
Miño, R., Rivera-Vargas, P., y Cobo, C. (2018). Virtual Communities As Safe Spaces Created By Young Feminists. Identity, Mobility and Sense of Belonging. En G. Stahl, S. Habib, y M. Ward (eds.), Identities, Youth and Belonging: International Perspectives (pp. 140–158). Basingstoke UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reason, P., y Bradbury, H. (eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Londres: Sage.
Rivera-Vargas, P., y Miño-Puigcercós, R. (2018). Young people and virtual communities: New ways of learning and of social participation in the digital society. Páginas de Educación, 11(1), 67–82. https://dx.doi.org/10.22235/pe.v11i1.1554
Rivera-Vargas, P., y Sánchez, J. A. (2016). Entornos, procesos y recursos tecnológicos de aprendizaje en el Grado de Pedagogía. En F. Hernández-Hernández, y J. M. Sancho-Gil (coords), La perspectiva DIY en la Universidad: ¡hazlo tú mismo y en colaboración! (pp. 72–77). Barcelona, España: Octaedro.
Rivera-Vargas, P., Sancho, J. M., y Sánchez, J. A. (2017). Los límites de la disrupción en el orden académico. La cultura DIY en la universidad. Páginas de Educación, 10(2), 127–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.22235/pe.v10i2.1428
Sancho, J. M. (2017a). ¿Qué conocimiento se fomenta y valora? ¿Dónde queda la equidad? En P. Rivera-Vargas, E. Sánchez, y R. Morales. (coords.), Conocimiento para la equidad social: pensando Chile globalmente (pp. 125–130). Santiago de Chile: Colección Políticas Públicas – USACH.
Sancho, J. M. (2017b). Discursos y prácticas en torno a las competencias en educación. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 15, 127–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/fjc201715127144
Sancho, J. M., y Rivera-Vargas, P. J. (2016). The Socio-Economic Evaluation of a European Project: The DIYLab Case. Informatics, 3(3), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/informatics3030013
Selwyn, N. (2017). Digital inclusion: Can we transform education through technology? En P. Rivera-Vargas, E. Sánchez, y R. Morales (coords.), Conocimiento para la equidad social: pensando Chile globalmente (pp. 103–108). Santiago de Chile: Colección Políticas Públicas – USACH.
Spencer, A. (2005). DIY: The rise of lo-fi culture. Boston: Marion Boyars Publishers.
Xie, C., Bagozzi, R. P., y Troye, S. V. (2008). Trying to prosume: toward a theory of consumers as co-creators of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 109–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0060-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep authorship rights and confer to REIRE the rights of article’s first publication.
All the contents included into REIRE Revista d’innovació i Recerca en Educació are under Creative Commons 4.0 International license attribution, which allows the article’s reproduction, distribution and public communication, whenever authorship and the journal’s title is quoted.
