Beyong pitch: Exploring Duration, Intensity and Silence in Japanese Focus Marking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/phonica2024.20.8

Abstract

Building on Jun’s prosodic typology (2005, 2014), this study examines how head and edge languages differ in their strategies for expressing focus. While head languages like English rely on pitch expansion in focus and post-focal compression, edge languages like Japanese are thought to emphasize boundary cues. Inspired by the framework proposed by Mizuguchi and Tateishi (2023), we hypothesized that in educated standard Japanese, focus marking extends beyond pitch modulation to include the boundary cues such as duration and silence insertions. To test this, we analyzed recordings of native speakers of educated standard Japanese producing noun phrases under broad and narrow focus conditions, examining duration, F0 maxima, intensity, and silence insertion at both the word and morpheme levels. The results demonstrate that while F0 maxima cue focus, duration and silence insertion play dominant roles in marking focus and focus position, especially at the word level. Intensity, in contrast, primarily cues accent, though it also signals focus position at the morpheme level in contexts with unaccented initial words, a particularly challenging environment for focus marking. These findings reveal a hybrid prosodic system in educated standard Japanese, where temporal and boundary cues dominate but pitch modulation remains an auxiliary tool. This system reflects the typological distinctions between head and edge languages, with educated standard Japanese relying on a flexible combination of global and local cues to signal focus. Future research should investigate how these cues are processed in perception and whether similar strategies are employed in other syntactic structures, offering broader insights into the prosodic systems of edge languages.

Keywords: Narrow Focus vs. Broad Focus; Japanese; Pitch; Duration; Silence

References

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Beckman, M. E. (2012). Stress and non-stress accent. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874020

Beckman, M. E., & Venditti, J. J. (2011). Intonation. In J. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. Yu (Eds.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 485-532). Wiley Blackwell.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch15

Beckman, M. E. & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology. 3, 55-309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000066X

Bodomo, A. B., & Marfo, C. O. (1996). The morphophonology of noun classes in Dagaare and Akan. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 5(2), 31–51.

Cooper, W. E., Eady, S. J., & Mueller, P. R. (1985). Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question–answer contexts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(6), 2142-2156.

https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392372

Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765-768. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908022

Igarashi, Y. (2014). Typology of intonational phrasing in Japanese dialects. Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 464–492). Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0015

Igarashi, Y (2015). Intonation. In H. Kubozono (Ed.), The handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology (pp. 539–567). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511984.525

Jun, S. A. (2005). Prosodic typology. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 430–458). Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0015

Jun, S. A. (2014). Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 520–539). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567300.003.0017

Kiss, K. É. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74(2), 245-273.

https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211

Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808814

Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32(4), 451-454. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908095

Maeda, K., & Venditti, J. J. (1998). Phonetic investigation of boundary pitch movements in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (paper 0800). https://doi.org/10.21437/ICSLP.1998-124

Mizuguchi, S., & Tateishi, K. (2023). Prominence in a Pitch Language: The Production and Perception of Japanese. Rowman & Littlefield.

Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2006). Phonetic cues to stress and accent in Spanish. In Selected proceedings of the 2nd conference on laboratory approaches to Spanish phonetics and phonology (pp. 104-118). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Ortega-Llebaria, M., & Prieto, P. (2011). Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish. Language and speech, 54(1), 73-97.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388014

Seo, J., Kim, S., Kubozono, H., & Cho, T. (2019). Preboundary lengthening in Japanese: To what extent do lexical pitch accent and moraic structure matter? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(3), 1817-1823. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5125186

Venditti, J. J. (2005). The J_ToBI model of Japanese intonation. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 172-200). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007

Venditti, J. J., Maekawa, K., & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Prominence marking in the Japanese intonation system. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 456–512). Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.013.0017

WEBMAUS forced aligner. (n.d.).

https://clarin.phonetik.uni-muenchen.de/BASWebServices/interface

Xu, Y., & Xu, C. X. (2005). Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. Journal of Phonetics, 33(2), 159–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

Issue

Section

ARTICLES