Interest of non-university teachers in educational research projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.42438Keywords:
interest, motivation, educational research, non-university teacherAbstract
INTRODUCTION. Educational research is a source of proven information and evidence for improving classroom teaching. The theoretical framework for this study is based on the concept of teacher motivation to engage in educational research.
METHOD. This study examined the levels of interest and participation in educational research of a sample of 429 teachers.
RESULTS. The results showed that there is a high correlation between all variables (participation, research competencies, motivation, and research knowledge) and three distinct teacher clusters/groups were determined. The first cluster was characterized by a high level of interest in research and active participation in research activities. The second cluster had a moderate level of interest and believed that research was positive and necessary but did not participate in research. Finally, the third cluster had no interest in research and did not participate in research activities.
DISCUSSION. These results have important implications for promoting research in the education field and suggest that efforts are needed to specifically engage the teachers who are currently not interested in research or are not involved in research activities.
References
Afdal, H., & Spernes, K. (2018). Designing and redesigning research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 215-228. https://doi.org/gjw477
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. https://doi.org/cdncw7
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/chx3zk
Böttcher-Oschmann, F., Groß Ophoff, J., & Thiel, F. (2021). Preparing teacher training students for evidence-based practice promoting students’ research competencies in research-learning projects. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1-11 (642107). https://doi.org/j7jm
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 20-32. https://doi.org/cx8vzt
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education. UCL Press. https://doi.org/j7jn
Goe, L. (2002). Helping teachers learn: Principles and practices for effective professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(3), 247-257.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1997). Looking in classrooms (8th ed.). Longman.
Guilbert, D., Lane, R., & Van Bergen, P. (2016). Understanding student engagement with research: A study of pre-service teachers’ research perceptions, research experience, and motivation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 172-187. https://doi.org/j7jp
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/fnm4h7
Jamovi Project. (2022). Jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Leite, C., Marinho, P., & Sousa-Pereira, F. (2023). Perspectivas académicas del nexo enseñanza-investigación en la formación inicial del profesorado en Portugal. Educación XX1, 26(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/j7jq
McCartney, E., Marwick, H., Hendry, G., & Ferguson, E. (2018). Eliciting student teacher’s views on educational research to support practice in the modern diverse classroom: A workshop approach. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 342-372. https://doi.org/j7jr
Obwegeser, N., & Papadopoulos, P. (2016). Integrating research and teaching in the IS classroom: Benefits for teachers and students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 27(4), 249–258. https://bit.ly/3hHY80x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/c48g8h
Sapsford, R. (2002). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Schildkamp, K., Kuiper, E., & Loughran, J. (2010). How do teachers use research evidence? A review of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1059-1069.
Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/bg52xz
Sousa, R., Lopes, A., & Boyd, P. (2020). Initial teacher education and the relationship with research: Student teachers’ perspectives. Studia Paedagogica, 25(2), 162-179. https://doi.org/j7js
SPSS. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 24.0). IBM Corp.
Stappenbelt, B. (2013). The effectiveness of the teaching-research nexus in facilitating student learning. Engineering Education, 8(1), 111-121. https://doi.org/j7jt
Taylor, J. (2007). The teaching: research nexus: A model for institutional management. Higher Education, 54, 867-884. https://doi.org/fqnfcd
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/ftzxsm
Wood, D. (2009). Challenges to strengthening the teaching and research nexus in the first-year undergraduate curriculum. The International Journal of Learning, 15(12), 111-120. https://doi.org/j7jv
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bartolomé Pizà-Mir, Beatriz Moreno-Vecino, Maria-Ventura Monserrat-Monserrat
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors keep authorship rights and confer to REIRE the rights of article’s first publication.
All the contents included into REIRE Revista d’innovació i Recerca en Educació are under Creative Commons 4.0 International license attribution, which allows the article’s reproduction, distribution and public communication, whenever authorship and the journal’s title is quoted.