Areas of invisibility that emerge from the pedagogical relationships. Sharing shadows between students and teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2015.8.28224Keywords:
Pedagogical relationships, Teachers and learners uncertainties, Participatory research, Higher education, Invisible ZonesAbstract
As teachers from the innovation group Indaga-t (GIDCUB-13/087), we share dilemas around our own teaching practice. We occupy a position (space of not knowing and/or want to know more) which bring us to reflect about the pedagogical relationships that emerge from the different spaces where we intervene. The project Invisible zones on the independent learning assessment (2013PID-UB/001) led us to explore the uncertainties that we have been experimenting as teachers, relating them with the concerns that students experienced in our subjects. This trajectory allowed us to define the “grey zones” as areas of uncertainty and discomfort through which we can problematize the learning experience as a becoming, looking closely at the interests game, the emerging dilemmas, the learning rhythms, and all the complexities intrinsic in our teaching practices. In this article we present our research work linked with two contexts: the subject of Sociology of Art, from the Degree in Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property Degree and The Digital and Visual Culture in Social and Educational Processes from the Degree in Pedagogy. From a methodology based on building teachers stories; interventions in the Foros from the Virtual Campus; and conversations in the classroom; the topics that emerged were related with: the consequences of negotiating how to work between teachers and students; the learning rhythms; the duration of the subjects; and the assessment as a reflective process by the learners.References
Atkinson, D. (2011). Art, Equity and Learning. Pedagogies Against the State. Rótterdam: Sense.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. y Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning. Putting it into practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Brown, M. (2008). Comfort Zone: Model or metaphor? Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 12(1), 3-12.
Champagne, M.F., Clayton, T., Dimmitt, N., Matthew, L., Savage, W., Shaw, J., Stroupe, R., Thein, M.M. y Walter, P. (2002). The assessment of learner autonomy and language learning. AILA Review, 15(0), 45-55.
Chan, V. (2000). Fostering Learner Autonomy in an ESL Classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 18 (1), 75-86.
Delgado, A.M. y Oliver, R. (2009). Interacción entre la evaluación continua y la autoevaluación formativa: La potenciación del aprendizaje autónomo. Red-U. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 4, 1-13.
Fendler, R. y Hernández-Hernández, F. (2014). What remains unseen: negotiating the grey areas of collaborative learning in a course on arts-based research. En las actas de: International Society for Education Through Art (InSEA). European Regional Congress, Canterbury, UK, 24-26 de junio.
Kenny, B. (1993). For more autonomy. System 21/4, 431-442.
Sánchez, J.A., Sancho, J.M. y Miño, R. (2013). Una experiencia de evaluación del aprendizaje autónomo. XXI Jornadas Universitarias de Tecnología Educativa. Valladolid. 27 y 28 de junio de 2013.
Siemens, G. (2004). Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital. Recuperado de www.diegoleal.org/docs/2007/Siemens(2004)-Conectivismo.doc
Stoll, L. Fink, D. y Earl, L. (2004). Sobre el aprender y el tiempo que requiere. Implicaciones para la escuela. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep authorship rights and confer to REIRE the rights of article’s first publication.
All the contents included into REIRE Revista d’innovació i Recerca en Educació are under Creative Commons 4.0 International license attribution, which allows the article’s reproduction, distribution and public communication, whenever authorship and the journal’s title is quoted.