Teamwork, peer assessment and double revision of assignments as strategies for teaching quantitative research methods in Sociology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2018.11.220569

Keywords:

Teamwork, Peer assessment, Double revision of assignments, Sociology, Statistics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Sociology and statistics are part of the study programme in many bachelor’s degrees and masters, some of them not focused primarily on quantitative research methods. This is the case of specific business management programmes, where quantitative research methods in sociology appear marginally in a single subject. In such subjects, we think it is necessary to introduce innovative teaching strategies which could motivate and help students in their learning process. METHOD. Here we describe our experience and results after implementing teamwork, peer assessment and double revision of assignments as strategies for teaching quantitative methods applied to sociological research in the Sport Business Management Master (SBMM) of the University of Barcelona. RESULTS. We observed that the grades for teamwork activities are positively correlated among themselves and that the individual grades on peer-assessment activities help to distinguish between higher and lower performing students, because they are positively correlated with final exam grades. DISCUSSION. These strategies are always well-received by students and help them in their learning process. We conclude that peer assessment can be easily combined with teamwork and used in our context as an individual activity instead of a final exam.

Author Biographies

Ana Maria Pérez-Marín, University of Barcelona

Department of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economy

Lidia Daza-Pérez, University of Barcelona

Departament of Sociology

Manuela Alcañiz-Zanón, University of Barcelona

Department of Econometrics, Statistics and Applied Economy

References

Baepler, P. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006

Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C. (2011). Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class. Science, 332, 862–864. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201783

Dochy, F., Segers, M., and Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self-, Peer, and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review. Studies in Higher Education, 24 (3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935

Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining Student Satisfaction with Group Projects and Peer Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240401

Nordberg, D. (2008). Group projects: More learning? Less fair? A conundrum in assessing postgraduate business education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698835

Opdecam, E., Everaert, P., and Van Keer, H. (2014). Preferences for Team Learning and Lecture-Based Learning among First-Year Undergraduate Accounting Students. Research in Higher Education, 55, 400–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9315-6

Paswan, A. K., and Gollakota, K. (2004). Dimensions of Peer Evaluation, Overall Satisfaction, and Overall Evaluation: An Investigation in a Group Task Environment. Journal of Education for Business, 79, (4), 275–231. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.79.4.225-231

Planas, A., Arbat, G., Feliu, L., Fraguell, R. M., Montoro, L., Pujol, J., Roura-Pascual, N., Suñol, J. J., and Zamora, L. M. (2012). Experiencia interdisciplinar de coevaluación: la percepción de los estudiantes de la Universidad de Girona, CIDUI 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.cidui.org/revistacidui/index.php/cidui/article/view/413

Shah, S. Z. A. (2013). The use of group activities in developing personal transferable skills. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.760778

Topping, K. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569

Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., and Pilot, A. (2007). Peer Assessment in University Teaching: Evaluating Seven Course Designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500262346

Yamarik, S. (2007). Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes? Journal of Economic Education, 38, 259-277. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30042780

Downloads

Published

2018-07-04

How to Cite

Pérez-Marín, A. M., Daza-Pérez, L., & Alcañiz-Zanón, M. (2018). Teamwork, peer assessment and double revision of assignments as strategies for teaching quantitative research methods in Sociology. REIRE Revista d’Innovació I Recerca En Educació, 11(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2018.11.220569

Issue

Section

Special Section: 1st International Conference in Experiences in Active Learning in Higher Education

Most read articles by the same author(s)