Revisión sistemática de tendencias en la aplicación de la inteligencia artificial al ámbito de la escritura académica en las ciencias sociales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.37-42Palabras clave:
ChatGPT, Escritura científico-académica, TendenciaResumen
El estudio de la aplicación de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la escritura científico-académica es importante para favorecer la eficiencia en la generación de contenido académico. Además, es necesario investigar cómo la IA puede ayudar a mejorar la claridad y precisión de la comunicación científica. En este sentido, se ha llevado a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura (scoping review) que ha tratado el uso de la IA, específicamente ChatGPT, en relación con la escritura académica. Esto a fin de identificar los enfoques temáticos y los diseños de indagación aplicados en los trabajos publicados sobre este tema y, así, orientar futuros proyectos en esta línea de investigación. Para llevar a cabo este estudio, se procedió con la localización de artículos en Web of Science y Scopus. Los principales resultados del trabajo revelan el interés por la escritura académica y la IA en relación con sus posibles aplicaciones, herramientas específicas y la detección de plagio, así como su uso ético y responsable. Asimismo, se ha constatado una utilización de variedad de métodos de investigación. La discusión final se centra en cómo la integración de la IA en la escritura científico-académica plantea tanto oportunidades como desafíos en términos de ética, calidad y autonomía intelectual.
Citas
Alberth. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in academic writing: a blessing or a curse in disguise? Teflin Journal, 34(2), 337-352. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i2/337-352
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing. Cureus Journal of Medical Science, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
Altmäe, S., Sola-Leyva, A., & Salumets, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: A friend or a foe? Reproductive Biomedicione Online, 47(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.04.009
Calvo, R. A., O’Rourke, S. T., Jones, J., Yacef, K., & Reimann, P. (2011). Collaborative Writing Support Tools on the Cloud. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.43
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
Desaire, H., Chua, A., Isom, M., Jarosova, R., & Hua, D. (2023). Distinguishing academic science writing from humans or ChatGPT with over 99% accuracy using off-the-shelf machine learning tools. Cell Reports Physical Science, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101426
Giray, L. (2023). Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51(12), 2629-2633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03272-4
Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A., & Ramasamy, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 20(6), 327-328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
Goldbort, R. (2006). Writing for Science. Yale University Press.
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hamamah, H., Emaliana, I., Hapsari, Y., Degeng, P. D. D., & Fadillah, A. C. (2023). Using Nominal Group Technique to Explore Publication Challenges and the Usefulness of AI-Based Writing Technologies: Insights From Indonesian Scholars. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(8), 2038-2047. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1308.20
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and Identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5
Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572
Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Kandeel, M. E., & Eldakak, A. (2024). Legal dangers of using ChatGPT as a co-author according to academic research regulations. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 13(1 Special issue), 289-298. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1siart3
Khlaif, Z. N., Mousa, A., Hattab, M. K., Itmazi, J., Hassan, A. A., Sanmugam, M., & Ayyoub, A. (2023). The Potential and Concerns of Using AI in Scientific Research: ChatGPT Performance Evaluation. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e47049-e47049. https://doi.org/10.2196/47049
Kong, S.-C., Lee, J. C.-K., & Tsang, O. (2024). A pedagogical design for self-regulated learning in academic writing using text-based generative artificial intelligence tools: 6-P pedagogy of plan, prompt, preview, produce, peer-review, portfolio-tracking. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19030
Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024). “AI, will you help?” How learners use Artificial Intelligence when writing. XLinguae, 17(1), 34-48. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.03
Livberber, T. (2023). Toward non-human-centered design: Designing an academic article with ChatGPT. Profesional de la Informacion, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.12
Mahyoob, M., Algaraady, J., & Alblwi, A. (2023). A Proposed Framework for Human-like Language Processing of ChatGPT in Academic Writing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(14), 282-293. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.41725
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Martin-Marchante, B. (2022). The use of ICTs and artificial intelligence in the revision of the writing process in Valencian public universities. Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA, 28, 16-31. https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.20622
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600-3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_718_23
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024). Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593
OpenAI. (2022). Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt
Ossa, C., & Willatt, C. (2023). Providing academic writing feedback assisted by Generative Artificial Intelligence in initial teacher education contexts. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v16i2.2412
Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Patel, A., Bakhtiyari, K., & Taghavi, M. (2011). Evaluation of cheating detection methods in academic writings. LIBRARY HI TECH, 29(4), 623-640. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111189732
Sabariego-Puig, M., Vilà-Baños, R., y Sandín-Esteban, M. (2014). El análisis cualitativo de datos con ATLAS.ti. REIRE Revista d'Innovació I Recerca en Educació, 7(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2014.7.2728
Semrl, N., Feigl, S., Taumberger, N., Bracic, T., Fluhr, H., Blockeel, C., & Kollmann, M. (2023). AI language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. HumanN Reproduction, 38(12), 2281-2288. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead207
Storey, V. A. (2023). AI Technology and Academic Writing: Knowing and Mastering the «Craft Skills». International Journal of Adult Education and Technology-IJAET, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJAET.325795
Tail, A. M. Y., Meyer, M., Varidel, M., Prodan, A., Vogel, M., Lorfino, F., & Krausz, R. M. (2023). Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T16-T30.
Tang, A., Li, K.-K., Kwok, K. O., Cao, L., Luong, S., & Tam, W. (2024). The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 56(2), 314-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12938
Thurlow, S. (2023). The other side of AI: Writing, thinking and creativity in an age of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T92-T102.
Tolchinsky, L. (2013). La escritura académica a través de las disciplinas. Octaedro / ICE-UB.
Utami, S. P. T., & Winarni, R. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419
Wale, B. D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Effects of using integrative automated writing evaluation programs on honing academic writing instruction. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 43(1), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v43i1.67715
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Francesc Martínez-Olmo, Felipe González Catalán
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
El/la autor/a que publica en esta revista está de acuerdo con los términos siguientes:
- El/la autor/a conserva los derechos de autoría y otorga a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de la obra
- Los textos publicados en Digital Education Review están bajo una licencia Reconocimiento-No comercial-Sin obras derivadas 4.0 España de Creative Commons.
- Para poder mencionar los trabajos se debe citar la fuente (DER) y el autor del texto.
- Digital Education Review (DER) no acepta ninguna responsabilidad por los puntos de vista y las declaraciones hechas por los autores en su trabajo.
