Impacte entre iguals als resultats educatius en Economia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.38063Paraules clau:
Efectes entre iguals, Aprenentatge en equip, Aprenentatge actiu, Treball en equip, EconomiaResum
INTRODUCCIÓ. Aquest article aprofundeix en l’estudi de les interaccions entre iguals a l’aula universitària. MÈTODE. Avaluem els efectes del treball en equip en el rendiment acadèmic individual en quatre assignatures que utilitzen l’aprenentatge basat en equips (ABE) dels graus d’Economia i d’Administració d’Empreses. RESULTATS. Trobem que les qualificacions individuals dels estudiants tenen una associació positiva i significativa amb la qualificació mitjana de la resta de membres de l’equip. La puntuació pròpia de l’estudiant augmenta aproximadament 0,65 punts per cada augment d’1 punt a la nota mitjana dels companys d’equip. Aquesta associació continua sent positiva i significativa fins i tot quan incloem variables sociodemogràfiques per controlar les característiques individuals. També contrastem l’heterogeneïtat dels efectes dels companys segons la capacitat de rendiment individual i d’equip. DISCUSSIÓ. Els resultats suggereixen que no hi ha heterogeneïtat en la capacitat individual, però trobem una diferència positiva o lleugerament negativa en la magnitud de l’efecte del treball entre iguals per als equips que es troben en el quartil superior/inferior, en contrast amb els equips que es troben al mig en la distribució.
Referències
Abio, G., Alcañiz, M., Gómez-Puig, M., Rubert, G., Serrrano, M., Stoyanova, A., & Vilalta-Bufí, M. (2019). Retaking a course in economics: Innovative teaching strategies to improve academic performance in groups of low-performing students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1389289
Abio, G., Alcañiz, M., Gómez-Puig, M., Royuela, V., Rubert, G., Serrano, M., & Stoyanova, A. (2021). Perception of students in Team-Based Learning: Evidence in Economics [Working paper].
Abio, G., Alcañiz, M., Gómez-Puig, M., Royuela, V., Rubert, G., Serrano, M., & Stoyanova, A. (2022). The use of active learning methods in Economics: A review of the research [Working paper].
Alpert, W. T., Couch, K. A., & Harmon, O. R. (2016). A randomized assessment of online learning. American Economic Review, 106(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161057
Artz, G., Jacobs, K., & Boessen, C. R. (2016). The whole is greater than the sum: An empirical analysis of the effect of team based learning on Student achievement. NACTA Journal, 60(4), 405–411.
Ahshan, R. (2021). A framework of implementing strategies for active student engagement in remote/online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090483
Becker, R., & Proud, S. (2018). Flipping quantitative tutorials. International Review of Economics Education, 29, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.01.004
Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive Learning Online at Public Universities: Evidence from a Six‐Campus Randomized Trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(4), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21728
Burke, M., & Sass, T. (2013). Classroom peer effects and student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/666653
Calimeris, L. (2018). Effects of flipping the principles of microeconomics class: Does scheduling matter? International Review of Economics Education, 29, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.01.002
Calimeris, L., & Sauer, K. M. (2015). Flipping out about the flip: All hype or is there hope? International Review of Economics Education, 20, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.08.001
Collado-Valero, J., Rodríguez-Infante, G., Romero-González, M., Gamboa-Ternero, S., Navarro-Soria, I., & Lavigne-Cerván, R. (2021). Flipped classroom: active methodology for sustainable learning in higher education during social distancing due to COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(10), 5336. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105336
Cosgrove, S. B., & Olitsky, N. H. (2014). Knowledge retention, student learning and blended course work: evidence from principles of economics courses. Southern Economic Journal, 82(2), 556–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12045
Emerson, T. L., English, L. K., & McGoldrick, K. (2015). Evaluating the cooperative component in cooperative learning: A quasi‐experimental study. The Journal of Economic Education, 46(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2014.978923
Epple, D., & Romano, R. (2011). Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin and M. O. Jackson (eds.), Handbook of Social Economics, 1(11), 1053–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53707-2.00003-7
Espey, M. (2010). Valuing teams: What influences student attitudes? NACTA Journal, 54(1), 31–40.
Ficano, C. K. C. (2019). Identifying differential benefits from a flipped-group pedagogy in introductory microeconomics. International Review of Economics Education, 30, 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.07.002
Green, A. (2014). The case for the traditional classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 16, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.04.002
Griffith, A. L., & Rask, K. N. (2014). Peer effects in higher education: A look at heterogeneous impacts. Economics of Education Review, 39, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.01.003
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Joyce, T., Crockett, S., Jaeger, D. A., Altindag, O., & O’Connell, S. D. (2015). Does classroom time matter? Economics of Education Review, 46, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.02.007
Kwak, D. W., Menezes, F. M., & Sherwood, C. (2015). Assessing the Impact of Blended Learning on Student Performance. Economic Record, 91(292), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12155
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. T., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
Lavy, V., Silva, O., & Weinhart, F. (2012). The good, the bad, and the average: Evidence on ability peer effects in schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(2), 367–414. https://doi.org/10.1086/663592
Lombardini, C., Lakkala, M., & Muukkonen, H. (2018). The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs. International Review of Economics Education, 29, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.01.003
Manski, C. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2004). Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching. Stylus.
Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from re¬search on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8
Odell, K. E. (2018). Team-Based learning and student performance: Preliminary evidence from a principles of macroeconomics classroom. International Review of Economics Education, 29, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.01.001
Olitsky, N. H., & Cosgrove, S. B. (2014). The Effect of Blended Courses on Student Learning: Evidence from Introductory Economics Courses. International Review of Economics Education, 15, 17–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2013.10.009
Olitsky, N. H., & Cosgrove, S. B. (2016). The better blend? Flipping the principles of microeconomics classtoom. International Review of Economics Education, 21, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.004
Oliván Blázquez, B., Masluk, B., Gascon, S., Fueyo Díaz, R., Aguilar-Latorre, A., Artola Magallón, I., & Magallón Botaya, R. (2019). The use of flipped classroom as an active learning approach improves academic performance in social work: A randomized trial in a university. PLoS One, 14(4), e0214623. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214623
Roach, T. (2014). Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education, 17, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144131
Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? Handbook of the Economics of Education (chapter 4, pp. 249–277). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00004-1
Sibley, J., Ostafichuk, P., & Michaelsen, L. K. (2014). Getting started with team-based learning. Stylus.
Spinger, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021
Swanson, E., McCulley, L. V., Osman, D. J., Scammacca Lewis, N., & Solis, M. (2019). The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis. Active learning in higher education, 20(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417731201
Topping, K. J. (2001). Thinking reading writing: A practical guide to paired learning with peers, parents and volunteers. Continuum International.
Umar, M., & Ko, I. (2022). E-learning: Direct effect of student learning effectiveness and engagement through project-based learning, team cohesion, and flipped learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031724
Wu, D. D. (2015). Online Learning in Postsecondary Education: A Review of the Empirical Literature (2013-2014) [Research report]. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.221027
Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677
Descàrregues
Publicades
Com citar
Número
Secció
Llicència
Drets d'autor (c) 2022 Gemma Abio, Manuela Alcañiz, Carlos M. Belloni, Marta Gómez-Puig, Luis Ortiz-Gracia, Vicente Royuela, Glòria Rubert, Mònica Serrano, Alexandrina Stoyanova
Aquesta obra està sota una llicència internacional Creative Commons Reconeixement 4.0.
L’autor conserva els drets d’autoria, i concedeix a REIRE els drets de la primera publicació de l’article.
Tots els continguts inclosos a la Revista d'Innovació i Recerca en Educació estan subjectes a la llicència Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional de Creative Commons, que permet la reproducció, distribució i comunicació pública sempre que es reconegui l'autor i la revista.
