Design and validation of a tool to evaluate Physical Education and Language integrated learning tasks

Diseño y validación de un instrumento para evaluar tareas de aprendizaje integrado de Educación Física y Lengua extranjera

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1344/did.2017.2.43-58

Palabras clave:

educación física, tareas AICLE, instrumento de evaluación, proceso de validación, formación del profesorado AICLE

Resumen

El artículo describe el diseño y validación de un instrumento para evaluar tareas de educación física (EF) en un entorno de aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lengua extranjera (AICLE). Se detalla el desarrollo del instrumento y el proceso de cinco fases usado para su asegurar su fiabilidad y validez. Se llevó a cabo una prueba preliminar de validez de contenido mediante la participación de cinco jueces expertos arrojando un porcentaje de acuerdo del 89% y un índice Kappa de 0’82. Posteriormente, se realizó una prueba piloto a cuyos resultados se le aplicó Alpha de Cronbach mostrando una consistencia interna de 0’84. Los resultados obtenidos sugieren que el instrumento descrito en el presente artículo es válido para evaluar actividades de educación física AICLE.

Biografía del autor/a

Josep Coral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Citas

Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London England: Chapman and Hall.

Bonett, D. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Stadistics, 27(4), 334-340.

Casey, A., Dyson, B., & Campbell, A. (2009). Action research in Physical Education: focusing beyond myself through cooperative learning. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 407-423.

Coral, J. (2013). Physical education and English integrated learning: How school teachers can develop PE-in-CLIL programmes. Temps d’Educació, 45, 41–65. Retrieved from http://www.raco.cat/index.php/TempsEducacio/article/view/274635


Coral, J., & Lleixà, T. (2013). Las tareas en el aprendizaje integrado de educación física y lengua extranjera (AICLE). Determinación de las características de las tareas mediante el análisis del diario de clase. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 24, 79–84.

Coral, J., & Lleixà, T. (2016). Physical education in content and language integrated learning: successful interaction between physical education and English as a foreign language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(1), 108-126. doi:10.1080/136700 50.2014.977766

Coral, J., & Lleixà, T. (2017). In-service Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) teachers: An action research project in professional learning in Catalonia. In P. Boyd & A.
Szplit (Ed.), Teachers and teacher educators learning through inquiry: International Perspectives (in press). Libron: Kraków.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

De Graaff, R., Koopman, G. J., Anikina, & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 603–624. doi:10.2167/beb462.0

Daly, J. (1978). Writing apprehension and writing competency. Journal of Educational Research, 72(1), 1-10.

Dimitrova, R., Ferrer-Wreder, L., & Galanti, R.M. (2016). Pedagogical and social climate in school questionnaire: Factorial validity and reliability of the teacher version. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(3), 282 –288.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M.E., & Short. D. (2010). Making content comprehensible for English learners. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: OUP.

Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Elliot, J. (2005). La investigación-acción en educación. Madrid: Morata.

Elliot, J. (2007). Reflecting where the action is. London: Routledge.

Erdogan, M., Özel, M., Uşak, M., & Prokob, P. (2009). Development and validation of an instrument to measure university students’ biotechnology attitude. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 255-264. DOI:10.1007/s10956-009-9146-6

Famose, J. P. (1992). Aprendizaje motor y dificultad de la tarea. Barcelona: Paidotribo.

Filardo, L., González-Cascos, E., & Riesco, L. (2011). On the validity of systemic functional approaches as a tool for selecting materials in CLIL context. A case study. Porta Linguarum, 16, 65-74.

Florence, J. (1991). Tareas significativas en Educación Física escolar. Barcelona: Inde.

Florit, C. (2010). Pràctica docent efectiva AICLE. Llicència A. Departament d’Ensenyament de la Generalitat de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://www.xtec.cat/sgfp/llicencies/200910/memories/
2052/pdeaicle.pdf

Galindo, J., Sanz, P., & De Benito, J. J. (2011). La universidad ante el reto de la transferencia del conocimiento 2.0: Análisis de las herramientas digitales a disposición del gestor de transferencia. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 17(3), 111-126.

Harris, M., Chisholm, C., & Burns, G. (2013). Using the knowledge transfer partnership approach in undergraduate education and practice-based training to encourage employer management. Education + Training, 55(2), 174-190.

Harro, M. (1997). Validation of a questionnaire to assess physical activity of children ages 4-8 years. Research Quaterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(4), 259-268.

House, A. E., House, B. J., & Campbell, M. B. (1981). Measures of interobserver agreement: Calculation formulas and distribution effects. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 3(1), 37-57.

Kear, K., Coffman, G. A., McKenna, M. G., & Ambrosio, A. L. (2000). Measuring attitude toward writing. A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 10-23.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.

López-Pastor, V.M., Monjas, R., & Manrique, J.C. (2011). Fifteen years of action research as professional development: seeking more collaborative, useful and democratic systems for teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 153-170.

Lleixà, T., Capllonch, M. & Gonzàlez, C. (2015). Competencias básicas y programación de Educación Física. Validación de un cuestionario diagnóstico. Retos. Nuevas tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 27, 52-57.

Lleixà, T., González-Arévalo, C., & Braz-Vieira, M. (2016). Integrating key competences in school physical education programmes. European Physical Education Review 1-20. doi: 10.1177/1356336X15621497.

Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 54, 69-79.

McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage.

Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. ( 2008). Uncovering CLIL. MacMillan: Oxford.

Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro, 21, 15-33.

Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality-CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Pulso, 33, 11–29.

Moore, P., & Lorenzo, F. (2015). Task-based learning and content and language integrated learning materials design: process and product. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 334-357. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2015.1053282

Morton, T. (2013). Critically evaluating materials for CLIL: Practitioners’ practices and perspectives.

In J. Grey (Ed.), Critical Perspectives on Language Teaching Materials (p. 111-136). London: Palgrave McMillan.

Nikula, T. (2015). Hands-on tasks in CLIL science classrooms as sites for subject-specific language use and learning. System, 54, 14-27.

Norman, K. A., & Calfee, R. C. (2004). Tile Test: A hands-on approach for assessing phonics in the early grades. The Reading Teacher, 58(1), 48-52.

Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279–295. doi:10.2307/3587464.

Parlebas, P. (2008). Juegos, deporte y sociedad. Léxico de praxiología motriz. Barcelona: Paidotribo.

Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: past, present and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315-341.

Pérez-Cañado, M.L. y Ráez-Padilla, J. (2012). Diseño y validación de cuestionarios para la valoración del sistema ECTS. REIFOP, 15(3), 145-179.

Rink, J. E. (2013). Measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84, 407–418.

Roberts, S., & Fairclough, S. (2012). A five-stage process for the development and validation of a systematic observation instrument: The system for observing the teaching of games in physical education (SOTG-PE). European Physical Education Review, 18(1), 97-113.

Rowe, P. J., Schuldheisz , J. M., & Van der Mars, H. (1997). Validation of SOFIT for measuring physical activity of first to eight-grade students. Pediatric /Exercise Science, 9, 136-149.

Sagasta, P., & Ipiña, N. (2016). Teacher educators growing together in a professional learning community: Analysing CLIL units of work implemented in Teacher Education. In D. Lagasabaster & A. Doiz (Eds), CLIL experiences in secondary and tertiary education (p. 161-196). Bern: Peter Lang.

Siedentop, D. (1998). Aprender a enseñar la educación física. Barcelona: Inde.

Tavakol, M, & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55.

Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2009). Playing to learn: A review of physical games in second language acquisition. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 645-668.

Torres, J. J., & Peguera, V. H. (2009). Cálculo de la fiabilidad y concordancia entre codificadores de un sistema de categorías para el estudio del foro online en E-Learning. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 27(1), 89-103.

Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Stes, A., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring teachers’ motivations for teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 64(2), 421-436.

Willis, J. (1998). Task-based learning. What kind of adventure?. The Language Teacher, 22, 7. Retrieved from: http://jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/2333-task-based-learning-what-kindadventure.

Zwozdiak-Myers, P. (2012). The teacher’s reflective practice handbook. London: Routledge.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-08-31

Número

Sección

Sección monográfica